
It’s a fallacious observation that women in power are going to make a significant change.Had that been the case American would have definitely given preference to Hillary over Obama!!
My point is that let’s elect a suitable candidate for positions that matter lot to our country.Let’s not be swayed by emotion-treating woman as supreme or above all flaws- while choosing people as policy makers.
What has been the contribution of Pratibha Patil as President till now ?
It’s a fashion in our times to boast of women’s abilities in glorified terms without bothering least to analyze their contributions in proper light.

Look at some of the contributions of female politicians.Indira Gandhi might be hailed as ”iron lady” and I too personally admire some of her decisions but that’s no reason to ignore the fact that she was a dictator who hated opposition of any sort.She was the first one to trample the dignity of courts for her vested interest.Can anyone forget the emergency period ?
What has been the contribution of Jayalalitha as CM ?What’s Mayawati is doing as CM ? Both of them have virtually set new records in field of corruption.

Benazir Bhutto too had been involved in corrupt practices.Bangladesh is at present in grip of female politics. However, with each passing day, Bangladesh is turning into paradise for all sort of extremists that have become huge threat for Indians.

So it’s clear that it’s not women in power that will make significant change.Only better candidates are going to change the destiny of any nation.It could be either he or she !!Let’s not commit the fatal blunder of glorifying the abilities of woman!!!
You mean to say that we should not promote the women participation in politics so that men's hegemony in politics continues uninterrupted.
Thanks for your views.It’s not the question of promoting women in politics.You should what should be the criteria to elect proper candidates? Should it be based on their eligibility or should we ignore the credentials for sake of gender based considerations? Think over it Ankita!!
”That would lead to severe sociological complications.”
That has already started effecting us.One of the leading sociologists have remarked that our present culture has placed societies across the globe on death bed.
”That has already started effecting us.One of the leading sociologists have remarked that our present culture has placed societies across the globe on death bed”.
I would be interested to know more about this wise person who said this. Indeed, feminism has started playing havoc with everybody. Men and women are complimentary and supported each other. That was nature’s intention. Quite to the contrary, feminism has created a gender war with women challenging the men. Slowly, as the men organise, the women would be in grave danger. Future generations of women will face the consequences of today’s generation of arrogant, mean, demanding and criminal women.
I read a lot.So it’s not possible for me to retain names of people that appear in the various articles.I do jot down important details but they often get misplaced.Anyway,I will surely provide you the name if I come to trace that article.
No problem buddy. I just wanted to know because I want to enhance my knowledge about this sociological phenomemnon that is happening and the impact of feminism.
And that one exception had proved to be highly lethal in form of emergency!! You also forget that it’s her party that ruled this nation for most of the time.You also ignore the fact that Sonia Gandhi was in the driver’s seat and just see the achievements of UPA-total failure at all the fronts !!
So the message is clear:Let’s highlight ideal and better candidates.That we need to learn from the Americans who rejected Hillary.
We have come up with Pratibha Patil? What she has done till now? What’s Mayawati-the messiah of Dalits-is doing nowadays ? Acting as sardaar of people engaged in extortion of money so that her birthday can be celebrated in grand manner!!
All those are wrong who dare to shatter the myths !!
One small correction. Indira Gandhi ruled India for close to 16 years. That makes it more than 25% of 62 years. Don’t you think you are giving more credit to men than what history assigns to them?
The sad thing is that women are taking the help of wrong set of values to glorify their womanhood.They are trying to be different and better than men but are eventually getting shaped up by the ideals that define men !!
People have borrowed all sorts of stupid perceptions of the Americans.Why don’t be borrow something better from them-something that enables us to distinguish between proper and improper ??They can use the sense of discrimination to reject Hillary but for us the very term women makes us lose all our reasoning!!!!
A woman is not a synonym for a good human being !!
That is where the confusion is. Women are using the traditional advantages here in saying that they are morally superior to men. They were once upon a time morally superior to men when they were restricted within four walls, not exposed to corruption and restricted. Now, they want to enjoy that benefit along with the new benefits of modernity and liberation. They want men to be traditional while want themselves to be liberated. point this out and they call us MCPs. But they don’t become MCPs FCPs when they want tradition to prevail.
If that’s so necessary then I am not against the idea.But then let’s have proper candidates only.Over all ,it’s not a sound logic that proper political representation of women in legislation is the ideal way to improve the situation of women in our country.
We men have started doing it already. If women perseve men as their rivals and enemies, we men will perceive women as our enemies.
Here they go again:
you've quoted some names above who have been corrupt.
Have a look at Mugabe in Zimbabwe(have u ever even heard of it??)
Saddam in Iraq
Hitler
Putin in russia
King in Saudi
I can go on with the list of great men abusing their own people
Blame game never ends my friend. Grow up!
May be my answer is some sort of blame game in your eyes.However, for conscious readers, it’s an attempt to set the records straight with presentation of proper facts.
Yes, I have heard the name of Robert Mugabe many times.
First I wish to thank you for presenting you views in a logical manner.Yes, you are correct.But you forget we are reaping what we have sown!! ” For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind ”.I like to ask from you how many times we have made proper choices as electorates?It has always been in our hands to reject wrong candidates.But we always failed to realize that.Even today we have not learnt lessons.Result:Very low voting percentage.
Is someone compelling you to elect these incompetent and corrupt male leaders ? Do you think better changes can be roped in by preferring corrupt and inefficient female leaders ? Let’s rise above gender specific views while determining eligibility of candidates.Or else be prepared for catastrophe !!
Women MPs, MLAs too have criminal records
Instead of emphasising on good persons, you want women to rule so that men can be slaves. Isn’t that the motive behind women’s power? I understand this trick. We have seen many laws that are violative of men’s rights. If women are given power instead of good persons [men and women], we will have more laws for you to extort.
Nobody said that male candidates are good. But women are not synonymous with goodness. The so-called fair sex is no longer fair.
It is not a reservation for male candidates but a reservation for bad candidates. Even women politicians are bad and commit murders.
How many male candidates are the better candidates?
You said about Pratibha Patil? What exceptional the other Presidents have done.
Do you have soft corner for BJP? You didn’t criticize a single leader of BJP.
I know the reason people become corrupt at the top and male or female are going to fall pray to that
Nature forces us to want our gens be the strongest and the more you have the more you want because it will help your gens survive over others
This is nature cruel and simple and applies to male and female
Arvind don’t follow any advice i give or any other that goes against the majority because they will destroy you and earth wouldn’t even know you were here
My point for women candidates was at least let them have a chance of stealing from the people for a change
Arvind the best advice i could give would be know how dizzy humans are and know you can’t input logic on dizzy
Find things that satisfy you and your short life on earth and leave all thoes battle fields you could die on to someone else that thinks they can crack the stupidity of emotion
Arvind i hope you can fight this idea that through truth and conversion you can change a formed mind
LET THE DIZZY WALLOW IN DIZZY YOU KNOW IT, I KNOW IT ,BUT MOST DON’T -SO DON’T BE STUPID LIKE MOST
I agree with you totally.However,as far as I am concerned,it’s very difficult to move with majority more so if the majority is on the wrong side of the fence!!!
Women MPs, MLAs too have criminal records
I am really surprised the way you have reacted on this forum.Either you didn’t read the article or you were more in tune with your premeditated orientations that come what may I am going to criticize.
That’s why you used the phrase”anti-woman” even as there is nothing anti woman in whole article.
It’s simply the tale of some of the female politicians that have ruled the roost in recent years.It’s an attempt to show the few chances they had they did nothing else other than setting wrong precedents.It’s also an attempt to make all of us more credential oriented than gender oriented while choosing representatives via electoral franchise.
Anyway,all so- called ”just a suggestion” are merely reflection of one’s mindset.I have no problem with these so called harmless suggestions.However, one cannot just ignore the dubious mindset which is the cause of such suggestions!!!!
Women MPs, MLAs too have criminal records
You must learn how to change direction when time calls for it
Pride and good intentions by offering a hungry lion vegetables is futile and dangerous
Don’t wast your time and short life by standing on top of a mountain and hollering because the people below are cultural and socially deaf
You see just as you can’t hear me, they can’t hear you
I can hear you but you know it’s not easy to quash old habits.I am trying my best to change directions but to indulge in pleasures when people around you are dying or for that matter are trapped in problems is just not possible!!!
I didn’t say you had to stop caring ,but know who to care for and who to talk to that can best help your concerns
As you see on this site bad stories are remembered and happy stories are quickly forgotten
That’s not happening only on this site.It’s happening elsewhere too.
Anyway, I find you advice a sound one !!
...........Thanks Vincent for making your presence felt in this debate.I had Indira Gandhi’s contributions in mind while penning this article.That’s why I feel let’s be judicious while selecting our representatives.If that’s not the case we are bound to suffer at the hands of wrong people.The suffering could be long if that person turns out to be woman !!
Local Opinions (43)
You mean to say that we should not promote the women participation in politics so that men's hegemony in politics continues uninterrupted.
Here they go again:
you've quoted some names above who have been corrupt.
Have a look at Mugabe in Zimbabwe(have u ever even heard of it??)
Saddam in Iraq
Hitler
Putin in russia
King in Saudi
I can go on with the list of great men abusing their own people
Blame game never ends my friend. Grow up!
Once some very refined soul like you gave me a brilliant advice:Don’t be afraid of brickbats.You are bound to receive them when you dare to say the truth.
No need to tell you that this advice is very close to my heart.I am ready to be ridiculed.I will not prevent myself from speaking what I feel as it is whether or not one appreciates it.
Look Wayne I am not against women politicians.I only want qualified candidates.Just tell me what’s the gain if I replace corrupt male leader with another corrupt female leader ?
Thanks for your views.It’s not the question of promoting women in politics.You should what should be the criteria to elect proper candidates? Should it be based on their eligibility or should we ignore the credentials for sake of gender based considerations? Think over it Ankita!!
And that one exception had proved to be highly lethal in form of emergency!! You also forget that it’s her party that ruled this nation for most of the time.You also ignore the fact that Sonia Gandhi was in the driver’s seat and just see the achievements of UPA-total failure at all the fronts !!
So the message is clear:Let’s highlight ideal and better candidates.That we need to learn from the Americans who rejected Hillary.
We have come up with Pratibha Patil? What she has done till now? What’s Mayawati-the messiah of Dalits-is doing nowadays ? Acting as sardaar of people engaged in extortion of money so that her birthday can be celebrated in grand manner!!
All those are wrong who dare to shatter the myths !!
People have borrowed all sorts of stupid perceptions of the Americans.Why don’t be borrow something better from them-something that enables us to distinguish between proper and improper ??They can use the sense of discrimination to reject Hillary but for us the very term women makes us lose all our reasoning!!!!
If that’s so necessary then I am not against the idea.But then let’s have proper candidates only.Over all ,it’s not a sound logic that proper political representation of women in legislation is the ideal way to improve the situation of women in our country.
May be my answer is some sort of blame game in your eyes.However, for conscious readers, it’s an attempt to set the records straight with presentation of proper facts.
Yes, I have heard the name of Robert Mugabe many times.
How many male candidates are the better candidates?
You said about Pratibha Patil? What exceptional the other Presidents have done.
Do you have soft corner for BJP? You didn’t criticize a single leader of BJP.
First I wish to thank you for presenting you views in a logical manner.Yes, you are correct.But you forget we are reaping what we have sown!! ” For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind ”.I like to ask from you how many times we have made proper choices as electorates?It has always been in our hands to reject wrong candidates.But we always failed to realize that.Even today we have not learnt lessons.Result:Very low voting percentage.
Is someone compelling you to elect these incompetent and corrupt male leaders ? Do you think better changes can be roped in by preferring corrupt and inefficient female leaders ? Let’s rise above gender specific views while determining eligibility of candidates.Or else be prepared for catastrophe !!
I am really surprised the way you have reacted on this forum.Either you didn’t read the article or you were more in tune with your premeditated orientations that come what may I am going to criticize.
That’s why you used the phrase”anti-woman” even as there is nothing anti woman in whole article.
It’s simply the tale of some of the female politicians that have ruled the roost in recent years.It’s an attempt to show the few chances they had they did nothing else other than setting wrong precedents.It’s also an attempt to make all of us more credential oriented than gender oriented while choosing representatives via electoral franchise.
Anyway,all so- called ”just a suggestion” are merely reflection of one’s mindset.I have no problem with these so called harmless suggestions.However, one cannot just ignore the dubious mindset which is the cause of such suggestions!!!!
I agree with you totally.However,as far as I am concerned,it’s very difficult to move with majority more so if the majority is on the wrong side of the fence!!!
I can hear you but you know it’s not easy to quash old habits.I am trying my best to change directions but to indulge in pleasures when people around you are dying or for that matter are trapped in problems is just not possible!!!
That’s not happening only on this site.It’s happening elsewhere too.
Anyway, I find you advice a sound one !!
One small correction. Indira Gandhi ruled India for close to 16 years. That makes it more than 25% of 62 years. Don’t you think you are giving more credit to men than what history assigns to them?
...........Thanks Vincent for making your presence felt in this debate.I had Indira Gandhi’s contributions in mind while penning this article.That’s why I feel let’s be judicious while selecting our representatives.If that’s not the case we are bound to suffer at the hands of wrong people.The suffering could be long if that person turns out to be woman !!
You are back with your stories of women being superior to men. Wait! You are saying that men have screwed up for centuries so now give women a chance to screw up. You don’t have a basic knowledge of human nature and the fact that nature made man to lead and not be a dummy house-husband. Men ruled the world and are not meant to trail behind women! That’s nature and its laws. We need to get good persons and not women for the sake of women assuming that women can’t be wrong.
We men have started doing it already. If women perseve men as their rivals and enemies, we men will perceive women as our enemies.
Women MPs, MLAs too have criminal records
Instead of emphasising on good persons, you want women to rule so that men can be slaves. Isn’t that the motive behind women’s power? I understand this trick. We have seen many laws that are violative of men’s rights. If women are given power instead of good persons [men and women], we will have more laws for you to extort.
Women MPs, MLAs too have criminal records
Women MPs, MLAs too have criminal records
We need to get good persons and not women for the sake of women assuming that women can’t be wrong.
..Yes,that’s the only way to bring desired changes.That’s the reason why Americans chose Obama over Hillary!!
”That would lead to severe sociological complications.”
That has already started effecting us.One of the leading sociologists have remarked that our present culture has placed societies across the globe on death bed.
The sad thing is that women are taking the help of wrong set of values to glorify their womanhood.They are trying to be different and better than men but are eventually getting shaped up by the ideals that define men !!
A woman is not a synonym for a good human being !!
That is where the confusion is. Women are using the traditional advantages here in saying that they are morally superior to men. They were once upon a time morally superior to men when they were restricted within four walls, not exposed to corruption and restricted. Now, they want to enjoy that benefit along with the new benefits of modernity and liberation. They want men to be traditional while want themselves to be liberated. point this out and they call us MCPs. But they don’t become MCPs FCPs when they want tradition to prevail.
Nobody said that male candidates are good. But women are not synonymous with goodness. The so-called fair sex is no longer fair.
It is not a reservation for male candidates but a reservation for bad candidates. Even women politicians are bad and commit murders.
”That has already started effecting us.One of the leading sociologists have remarked that our present culture has placed societies across the globe on death bed”.
I would be interested to know more about this wise person who said this. Indeed, feminism has started playing havoc with everybody. Men and women are complimentary and supported each other. That was nature’s intention. Quite to the contrary, feminism has created a gender war with women challenging the men. Slowly, as the men organise, the women would be in grave danger. Future generations of women will face the consequences of today’s generation of arrogant, mean, demanding and criminal women.
I read a lot.So it’s not possible for me to retain names of people that appear in the various articles.I do jot down important details but they often get misplaced.Anyway,I will surely provide you the name if I come to trace that article.
No problem buddy. I just wanted to know because I want to enhance my knowledge about this sociological phenomemnon that is happening and the impact of feminism.
Global Opinions (4)
You made some very good logical points that will be looked on as anti woman, because emotion won’t let your logic be seen
In politics there are no good candidates,only people looking out for themselves and if not corrupt going in they will be corrupt when leaving
Men by the millions have been screwing up the world and as i see it until millions of woman ,not just a few screw up the world- i say give them a chance
I don’t think any system of ruling people will produce total harmony and peace
If i had to look a person in the eye for mercey my bets would be on woman for giving it
BE well–
I know the reason people become corrupt at the top and male or female are going to fall pray to that
Nature forces us to want our gens be the strongest and the more you have the more you want because it will help your gens survive over others
This is nature cruel and simple and applies to male and female
Arvind don’t follow any advice i give or any other that goes against the majority because they will destroy you and earth wouldn’t even know you were here
My point for women candidates was at least let them have a chance of stealing from the people for a change
Arvind the best advice i could give would be know how dizzy humans are and know you can’t input logic on dizzy
Find things that satisfy you and your short life on earth and leave all thoes battle fields you could die on to someone else that thinks they can crack the stupidity of emotion
Arvind i hope you can fight this idea that through truth and conversion you can change a formed mind
LET THE DIZZY WALLOW IN DIZZY YOU KNOW IT, I KNOW IT ,BUT MOST DON’T -SO DON’T BE STUPID LIKE MOST
You must learn how to change direction when time calls for it
Pride and good intentions by offering a hungry lion vegetables is futile and dangerous
Don’t wast your time and short life by standing on top of a mountain and hollering because the people below are cultural and socially deaf
You see just as you can’t hear me, they can’t hear you
I didn’t say you had to stop caring ,but know who to care for and who to talk to that can best help your concerns
As you see on this site bad stories are remembered and happy stories are quickly forgotten
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 














You made some very good logical points that will be looked on as anti woman, because emotion won’t let your logic be seen
In politics there are no good candidates,only people looking out for themselves and if not corrupt going in they will be corrupt when leaving
Men by the millions have been screwing up the world and as i see it until millions of woman ,not just a few screw up the world- i say give them a chance
I don’t think any system of ruling people will produce total harmony and peace
If i had to look a person in the eye for mercey my bets would be on woman for giving it
BE well–
Once some very refined soul like you gave me a brilliant advice:Don’t be afraid of brickbats.You are bound to receive them when you dare to say the truth.
No need to tell you that this advice is very close to my heart.I am ready to be ridiculed.I will not prevent myself from speaking what I feel as it is whether or not one appreciates it.
Look Wayne I am not against women politicians.I only want qualified candidates.Just tell me what’s the gain if I replace corrupt male leader with another corrupt female leader ?
You are back with your stories of women being superior to men. Wait! You are saying that men have screwed up for centuries so now give women a chance to screw up. You don’t have a basic knowledge of human nature and the fact that nature made man to lead and not be a dummy house-husband. Men ruled the world and are not meant to trail behind women! That’s nature and its laws. We need to get good persons and not women for the sake of women assuming that women can’t be wrong.
We need to get good persons and not women for the sake of women assuming that women can’t be wrong.
..Yes,that’s the only way to bring desired changes.That’s the reason why Americans chose Obama over Hillary!!